Home ] Su ]

 

Pentax bayonet mounts

The *ist press release states that the new SLR features KAF mount. That's not correct, since it lacks diaphragm simulator. Since so many variations of the K bayonet do exist, let's start with a quick survey of Pentax bayonet mount evolution (see figure below). 

The original K bayonet (1975) was of completely mechanical type, featuring a diaphragm simulator coupling (4) for full-aperture metering, a camera-to-lens stop-down actuator (2) for when taking the picture (actual diaphragm set on aperture ring) and lens release mechanism (3). In this operation, the stop-down actuator simply releases the diaphragm, while actual taking aperture is manually set by the lens ring. This allows both aperture priority and manual exposure.

Leaving aside Kf mount for the ME-F (which had no further development), the most important improvement came with the Super A (1983). In order to allow shutter priority and program exposure, six electrical contacts (c) were added, for transmitting minimum aperture and aperture range of each lens (coded, in half stops) to the camera. Contacts r1, r2 and r3 transmit diaphragm range, while m1 and m2 tell minimum aperture (f/16, f/22, f/32 or f/45). Provided that the lens diaphragm ring is set to A (auto), a ball contact (*) is raised on the lens bayonet. This way the camera is informed that it has to read at full aperture (as usual) and then operate the diaphragm, by means of a proportional movement of the stop-down actuator. To that purpose, when changing K bayonet to KA type, Pentax modified the way the stop-down mechanism works in their lenses, from incremental to linear (each f/stop needs the same angle movement). This improved bayonet also allows both shutter priority and program exposure.

In 1987, with the introduction of the autofocus SF-series cameras and F-series lenses, an AF coupling (5) was added between body and lens. A seventh contact (d) was of digital type, transmitting information about the lens by using proprietary serial protocol. Of course, KAF mount also retained all of the features of the KA bayonet. 

Then, in 1991, the Z-series SLR's introduced the improved KAF2 mount, featuring power zoom and new, more refined, electronics for digital transmission. A new ROM inside each lens tells the camera more information and also causes some incompatibility problems with third party lenses and their (not fully) compatible electronics. Two more contacts (6) were also added to the mount for powering the zoom motor in each lens. 

For better understanding, here is a schematic of KAF2 mount, the most advanced Pentax bayonet so far, and its working parts.

1 mark for lens fitting 4 diaphragm simulator coupling c electrical contacts
2 stopping down release 5 AF transmission shaft d digital contact
3 lens locking pin & notch 6 power zoom supply

For further in-deep info about K mount development, variations and compatibility, visit http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/

In spite of so much electronics added during the years, all of the mechanics was still there to grant full backward compatibility. That's the Pentax way, one of the best reasons for sticking to Pentax, you know.

Canon, Contax and Minolta changed their lens mounts without caring so much of their customers, Nikon did "improvements" which leave their cameras meterless when using older lenses (and most people will continue thinking that current SLR's still use the original F mount). What about Pentax? Sure Pentax won't do that to their loyal customers...

Unfortunately, some certainties start to fade. Starting with the MZ-50 (1997), Pentax entry-level SLR's (MZ-50, MZ-30 and MZ-60) started using the so called "crippled KAF" mount. This unoffocial designation has been dubbed by Pentax aficionados, for distinguish it from the full-working KAF. The crippled KAF features no diaphragm simulator, hence compatibility with K- and M-series lenses (the most diffused ones in secondhand market) has gone. Here follows a chart with features of different Pentax K mount variations as seen so far.

  YEAR 1 2 3 4 5 6 c d  
K 1975 O O O O - - - - LX, K- and M-series cameras and lenses
Kf 1981 O O O O - - - - ME-F only: Kf mount features some extra contacts (not shown here)
KA  1983 O O O O - - O - A-series and P-series cameras, A-series lenses
KA2 * 1997 O O O O - - O O MZ-M only (manual focus)
KAF 1987 O O O O O - O O SF-series cameras, MZ-6, MZ-7, F-series lenses
KAF (crippled). 1997 O O O - O - O O MZ-30, MZ-50, MZ-60, *ist, FA-J series lenses (no diaphragm ring)
KAF2 1991 O O O O O O O O Z-series & MZ-series cameras (with exceptions), FA-series lenses
O means present, - means missing                * KA2 is KA plus digital contact (or KAF minus AF coupling)

The *ist (film version) features the crippled KAF mount, while the new FA J series lenses (18-35mm, 28-80mm and 75-300mm) have no aperture ring. At this point, you have cameras which cannot accept old lenses and (even worse) new lenses not compatible with new cameras! In fact four out of six cameras in current Pentax line (MZ-S, MZ-3, MZ-5N and MZ-M) require diaphragm ring on lenses to perform aperture priority and manual exposure, while just MZ-60 and MZ-6 (which will probably be superseded by the *ist) can accept the FA J series. 

At first, we all hoped that FA J series could be just a few budget lenses for lower end cameras, even though it is very questionable if a minor player like Pentax can afford to manage two partially compatible SLR systems in their lineup. Now the situation becomers more and more worrying, as we start considering the *ist D (digital version), which is the future of Pentax SLR.

The puzzling *ist D mount

In their *ist D press release, Pentax say the new digital SLR to be compatible with all K-bayonet variations. That could support the idea of the FA J series being budget lenses only. However, there are two more aspects to consider:

1 - The FA J 18-35mm for the *ist D is FA J, hence no diaphragm ring. That's not exactly a budget lens.

2 - The *ist D prototype features the crippled KAF mount (no diaphragm simulator), just like the film *ist!

At this point, there are two possibilities:

a) Pentax lies, and the *ist D won't be truly compatible with pre-A lenses.

b) The mass produced *ist D will feature full KAF mount, not the crippled one.

Last surprise: the prototype FA J 18-35mm seems to have a diaphragm simulator! Without a manual aperture ring on it, that makes no sense at all. Is it fixed? Am I missing anything here?

I'm not sure what Pentax will do with the *ist D, but Pentax fans are waiting for seeing the mass produced model. Then so many of them will decide if they have to stick to Pentax even in the digital SLR era or switch to another, more convincing make. Pentax, you're deciding your future here, please don't fail.

Here below are some comparison pictures and comments. Sorry for poor picture quality, due to low light and camera shake when shooting at the *ist D. Click on images to enlarge.


At first sight, little difference between MZ-S and *ist D inside mirror box. Just a smaller mirror and missing power zoom contacts, as expected. The finder screen looks to be interchangeable.


Then, at closer inspection, a bad difference shows up: no diaphragm simulator in the prototype *ist D!


It looks like the *ist D (right) has TTL meter cell on left side of mirror box, just like the Super A (left), and unlike the MZ-S (center).


By looking at lenses, you spot plastic mount on 18-35mm. Apart from black finish, you can understand that by the missing insulating insert (present in metal mount) and the additional metal "shortening" contact.


Second surprise: it looks like the 18-35mm zoom lens has diaphragm simulator! How is it possible without diaphragm ring? It could be fixed, but maybe it is better we stop speculation and wait for the product.

 


Page updated 1st Apr. 2003