|
Pentax
bayonet mounts
The *ist press release states that
the new SLR features KAF mount. That's not correct, since it lacks
diaphragm simulator. Since so many variations of the K bayonet do exist, let's start with a quick survey of Pentax bayonet mount evolution (see figure below).
The original K bayonet (1975) was of
completely mechanical type, featuring a diaphragm simulator coupling (4)
for full-aperture metering, a camera-to-lens stop-down actuator (2) for
when taking the picture (actual diaphragm set on aperture ring) and lens
release mechanism (3). In this operation, the stop-down actuator simply
releases the diaphragm, while actual taking aperture is
manually set by the lens ring. This allows both aperture priority and
manual exposure.
Leaving aside Kf mount for the ME-F
(which had no further development), the most important
improvement came with the Super A (1983). In order to allow shutter
priority and program exposure, six electrical contacts (c) were added,
for transmitting minimum aperture and aperture range of each lens (coded,
in
half stops) to the camera. Contacts r1, r2 and r3 transmit diaphragm
range, while m1 and m2 tell minimum aperture (f/16, f/22, f/32 or f/45).
Provided that the lens diaphragm ring is set to A (auto), a ball contact
(*) is raised on the lens bayonet. This way the camera is informed that
it has to read at full aperture (as usual) and then operate the
diaphragm, by means of a proportional movement of the stop-down
actuator. To that purpose, when changing K bayonet to KA type, Pentax
modified the way the stop-down mechanism works in their lenses, from
incremental to linear (each f/stop needs the same angle movement). This
improved bayonet also allows both shutter priority and program exposure.
In 1987, with the introduction of the
autofocus SF-series cameras and F-series lenses, an AF coupling (5) was added between body and lens.
A seventh contact (d) was of digital type, transmitting information
about the lens by using proprietary serial protocol. Of course, KAF mount
also retained all of the features of the KA bayonet.
Then, in
1991, the Z-series SLR's introduced the improved KAF2 mount, featuring power zoom and new, more refined,
electronics for digital transmission. A new ROM inside each lens tells
the camera more information and also causes some incompatibility problems
with third party lenses and their (not fully) compatible electronics. Two more contacts (6) were also added to the
mount for powering the zoom motor in each lens.
For better understanding, here is a schematic of KAF2 mount, the most
advanced Pentax bayonet so far, and its working parts.

| 1 mark for lens
fitting |
4 diaphragm
simulator coupling |
c electrical
contacts |
| 2 stopping down
release |
5 AF transmission
shaft |
d digital contact |
| 3 lens locking pin
& notch |
6 power zoom supply |
|
For further in-deep info about K mount
development, variations and compatibility, visit http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
In spite of so much electronics added
during the years, all of the mechanics was still there to grant full backward compatibility.
That's the Pentax way, one of the best reasons for sticking to Pentax,
you know.
Canon, Contax and Minolta
changed their lens mounts without
caring so much of their customers, Nikon did "improvements" which
leave their cameras meterless when using older lenses (and most people will
continue thinking that current SLR's still use the original F mount). What about Pentax? Sure Pentax won't do that to their loyal
customers...
Unfortunately, some certainties start
to fade. Starting with the
MZ-50 (1997), Pentax entry-level SLR's (MZ-50, MZ-30 and MZ-60) started
using the so called "crippled KAF" mount. This unoffocial
designation has been dubbed by Pentax aficionados, for distinguish it
from the full-working KAF. The crippled KAF features no diaphragm
simulator, hence compatibility with K- and M-series lenses (the most
diffused ones in secondhand market) has gone. Here follows a chart with
features of different Pentax K mount variations as seen so far.
| |
YEAR |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
c |
d |
|
| K |
1975 |
O |
O |
O |
O |
- |
- |
- |
- |
LX, K- and M-series
cameras and lenses |
| Kf |
1981 |
O |
O |
O |
O |
- |
- |
- |
- |
ME-F only: Kf mount
features some extra contacts (not shown here) |
| KA |
1983 |
O |
O |
O |
O |
- |
- |
O |
- |
A-series and P-series
cameras, A-series lenses |
| KA2 * |
1997 |
O |
O |
O |
O |
- |
- |
O |
O |
MZ-M only (manual
focus) |
| KAF |
1987 |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
- |
O |
O |
SF-series cameras,
MZ-6, MZ-7, F-series lenses |
| KAF (crippled). |
1997 |
O |
O |
O |
- |
O |
- |
O |
O |
MZ-30, MZ-50, MZ-60, *ist, FA-J
series lenses (no diaphragm ring) |
| KAF2 |
1991 |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
O |
Z-series &
MZ-series cameras (with exceptions), FA-series lenses |
| O means
present, - means missing
* KA2 is KA plus digital contact (or KAF minus AF coupling) |
|
The *ist (film version)
features the crippled KAF mount, while the new FA J series lenses
(18-35mm, 28-80mm and 75-300mm) have no aperture ring. At this point,
you have cameras which cannot accept old lenses and (even worse) new
lenses not compatible with new cameras! In fact four out of six
cameras in current Pentax line (MZ-S, MZ-3, MZ-5N and MZ-M) require
diaphragm ring on lenses to perform aperture priority and manual
exposure, while just MZ-60 and MZ-6 (which will probably be superseded by the
*ist) can accept the FA J series.
At first, we all hoped
that FA J series could be just a few budget lenses for lower end
cameras, even though it is very questionable if a minor player like
Pentax can afford to manage two partially compatible SLR systems in
their lineup. Now the situation becomers more and more worrying, as we
start considering the *ist D (digital version), which is the future of
Pentax SLR.
The
puzzling *ist D mount
In their *ist D press
release, Pentax say the new digital SLR to be compatible with all
K-bayonet variations. That could support the idea of the FA J series being
budget lenses only. However, there are two more aspects to consider:
1 - The FA J 18-35mm for
the *ist D is FA J, hence no diaphragm ring. That's not exactly a budget
lens.
2 - The *ist D prototype
features the crippled KAF mount (no diaphragm simulator), just like the
film *ist!
At this point, there are
two possibilities:
a) Pentax lies, and the
*ist D won't be truly compatible with pre-A lenses.
b) The mass produced *ist
D will feature full KAF mount, not the crippled one.
Last
surprise: the prototype FA J 18-35mm seems to have a diaphragm
simulator! Without a manual aperture ring on it, that makes no
sense at all. Is it fixed? Am I missing anything here?
I'm not sure what Pentax
will do with the *ist D, but Pentax fans are waiting for seeing the mass
produced model. Then so many of them will decide if they have to stick
to Pentax even in the digital SLR era or switch to another, more
convincing make. Pentax, you're deciding your future here, please don't
fail.
|
Here
below are some
comparison pictures and comments. Sorry for poor picture quality, due to
low light and camera shake when shooting at the *ist D. Click on images
to enlarge. |
|
At first sight,
little difference between MZ-S and *ist D inside mirror box.
Just a smaller mirror and missing power zoom contacts, as
expected. The finder screen looks to be interchangeable.
|
|

Then, at closer
inspection, a bad difference shows up: no diaphragm simulator in
the prototype *ist D!
|
|

It looks like the
*ist D (right) has TTL meter cell on left side of mirror box,
just like the Super A (left), and unlike the MZ-S (center).
|
|

By looking at
lenses, you spot plastic mount on 18-35mm. Apart from black
finish, you can understand that by the missing insulating insert
(present in metal mount) and the additional metal
"shortening" contact.
|
|

Second surprise: it
looks like the 18-35mm zoom lens has diaphragm simulator! How is
it possible without diaphragm ring? It could be fixed, but maybe it is better we stop
speculation and wait for the product.
|
|